One very strange-- and occasionally distressing-- tradition at newspapers is that editors write the headlines even for opinion pieces written by other people. In other words, and those who have written op-eds know, you submit your op-ed, and the editors give it some weird headline of their own choosing, instead of the one you thought would be good. Sometimes this works out very well -- the editors think of something pithy and clever you'd never have thought of-- but other times they come up with something that's completely off base, or even actively misleading in terms of its (non)relation to what you wrote. (
I felt that way about my most recent LAT column, which was about the implications of the Hamdan decision for potential liability under the War Crimes Act. This time, the headline ended up being Did Bush Commit War Crimes?, which was frustrating, since the piece was intended as sober analysis, and never suggested that Bush himself commited war crimes or could be prosecuted for the same-- but the headline was, well, rather provocative, and so far about fifty people have sent me enraged emails.)
I wonder about the origin of separating the writing of headlines from the writing of articles-- especially opinion pieces. Is it just an odd tradition? Or is there some logic behind it?
Well, did Bush commit war crimes?
Posted by: Guest | July 03, 2006 at 06:58 PM
Rosa -- my collegiate newspaper experience is a little rusty but ... article writers generally don't know where their articles will appear in the paper, and whether they will run over one column, two columns or many columns of text. Generally, the font size of headlines is fixed by paper style so you can't really write a headline until you know what space you have to fill. And headlines generally need to fill the space alloted, white space being frowned upon. This makes for tricky writing, esp with one and two-column heads, since words can't be hyphenated in headlines and short words can leave too much white space while other word combinations won't fit so .... editors write heads at the last minute.
Posted by: Joshua Dienstag | July 03, 2006 at 08:57 PM
I had a similar experience when I wrote a piece for the Los Angeles Times on how Justice O'Connor's replacement might change the direction of the Supreme Court. The editors chose the headline, "O'Connor's Successor Will Likely Be a Swinger." Hmm, not exactly what I had in mind.
Posted by: Orin Kerr | July 11, 2006 at 06:04 PM
Well, I would add my voice to that of "guest": is it that far-fetched to entertain the notion that the president of the United States could be held liable for his actions in connection with the illegal invasion of Iraq?
Posted by: Ibn Kafka | July 18, 2007 at 10:22 AM
Chief Justice Robert's decision for the unanimous Court in in the law school/military recruiting
Posted by: Coach Outlet | July 28, 2010 at 07:14 PM
We shall defend ourselves to the last breath of man and beast. (William II, King of England)
Posted by: Air jordan shoes | September 15, 2010 at 08:43 PM
Keep a bag packed with things you need for each vacation. You won't forget them plus it saves you time
Posted by: pandora bracelets | June 07, 2011 at 02:57 AM
If you have been issued with a winding up petition for your company because the company owes money. You can pay the money owed before the court date and get the case droped or fight it if you believe it to be worth defending.
Posted by: Winding Up Petition | November 10, 2011 at 08:26 AM
Moe Nawaz is recognised as the UK's Most Trusted Insolvency Auditors and mastermind business coach. He has worked in the turnaround industry since 1989. Moe helps over 500 business people every year via a free advice line ukadvice.com. Moe is the founder of mastermind business coaching and a mastermind executive coach himself. His clients include high tech companies, manufacturers, financial services, entrepreneurs and family run businesses throughout Europe. He has been featured on TV, Radio and other Media.
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 24, 2011 at 02:51 PM