So there is a new television show on Fox that begins tonight called "Justice." Looking briefly at the description of the first episode, it looks like the show will be like all the other ones -- more about the lawyers than litigation, more about celebrity than advocacy, more about truth than fair process. Given the extent to which this blog has already discussed television legal drama already, I won't belabor the point here, but I do wonder what it is the television producers think has not yet been covered by yet another law show that perverts the perception of the practice of law? I'll be eager to hear what people have to say about this new show.
I watched Justice last night because I heard somewhere that it was supposed to be a legal version of my favorite television drama, House. It probably goes without saying, but the show didn't live up to its billing. The cast was awful, the plot was contrived, and it made a mockery of legal proceedings (which would be apparent even if your only knowledge of proper trial procedure came from other television programs).
I only mention the show here because it struck me as the kind of thing that could be interesting to members and readers of this blog. The show's principle theme is the relationship between justice and the media, and it explores this theme through a number of angles. First, a major segment of the episode was devoted to Court TV-like analysis of the trial and its participants. Perhaps more interestingly, however, was the extensive use of visual media by both the prosecution and defense at trial. These included graphic photographs of the victim's body, in-court demonstrations, and digitally created videos of the opposing theories. Of course, it was an appallingly inaccurate portrayal of actually admissible evidence, but it certainly taps in to the increasingly visual nature of courtroom proceedings and perhaps the jury's desire to have information presented to them visually (for better or worse).
Posted by: Chris Buccafusco | August 31, 2006 at 05:09 PM
Chief Justice Robert's decision for the unanimous Court in in the law school/military recruiting
Posted by: Coach Outlet | July 28, 2010 at 07:32 PM
I won't belabor the point here, but I do wonder what it is the television producers think has not yet been covered by yet another law show that perverts the perception of the practice of law? I'll be eager to hear what people have to say about this new show.
Posted by: UGG Sale | January 14, 2011 at 12:25 AM
Thanks for the comments.Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles.
Posted by: cheap uggs for sale | September 27, 2011 at 11:59 PM
I like ANMJ on FB & just subscribed to the email feed! :)
Posted by: louboutin schaussures | September 29, 2011 at 12:21 AM
If you have been issued with a winding up petition for your company because the company owes money. You can pay the money owed before the court date and get the case droped or fight it if you believe it to be worth defending.
Posted by: Winding Up Petition | November 10, 2011 at 08:24 AM
I first came to visit your site, this article is worth people thinking about people watching, very pleased to meet you here! Thank you for sharing this with us win a good article!
Posted by: Moncler Fur collar | November 20, 2011 at 07:28 PM
Moe Nawaz is recognised as the UK's Most Trusted Insolvency Auditors and mastermind business coach. He has worked in the turnaround industry since 1989. Moe helps over 500 business people every year via a free advice line ukadvice.com. Moe is the founder of mastermind business coaching and a mastermind executive coach himself. His clients include high tech companies, manufacturers, financial services, entrepreneurs and family run businesses throughout Europe. He has been featured on TV, Radio and other Media.
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 24, 2011 at 02:46 PM