I spend a lot of time in my constitutional law class discussing with my students how the predominant rule of Marbury v. Madison (that it is the Supreme Court who "says what the law [the Constitution] is" ) is not how things work in practice. Congress interprets the Constitution and implements that interpretation through, among other ways, its section 5 powers under the Fourteenth Amendment (see Katzenbach v. Morgan; cf. City of Boerne), to say nothing of its section 2 powers under the Thirteenth Amendment (see Jones v. Alfred Mayer). The President interprets the Constitution and implements that interpretation through, among other ways, his "take care" powers (most obviously these days through the current executive's use of signing statements). State elected officials also swear oaths to the Constitution, promising that their duties be discharged in conformance with that supreme document, which would presume thoughtful attention to what that document demands (what it means).
I would guess that many of us have not sworn oaths to uphold the Constitution, but that does not preclude us from interpreting it and making it meaningful in and through our daily lives. Indeed, as many constitutional law professors can probably verify, law students come to constitutional law class misbelieving the scope of their constitutional rights. What contributes to that misbelief? So much of our every day life, our popular culture, advertising. See this company, for example, whose advertisement I pondered on the way to work. Against a red, white and blue background, the ad copy read: "Divided We Stand, United We File." It had a picture of two wedding rings, one plain the other diamond-laden. And then it said underneath the rings and next to an image of the cracked liberty bell, "We, The People." I had no idea what the ad was for -- gay marriage (was this about tax fraud, filing federal forms seperately and state forms jointly (at least here in Massachusetts)? A ballot initiative? I got to thinking about all the ways these ubiquitous phrases could be meaningful. When I finally made my way to the front of the subway car, I saw it was a document filing service. What??
The language of our constitutional polity -- united and divided (federalism?), "we, the people," (democracy and individuality) -- circulates everywhere, consciously and unconsciously. Perhaps this is just too obvious for most readers, but as I slog through some difficult cases with my constitutional law students, I am reminded by them that this constitutional law stuff feels unfamiliar to them, strange, difficult -- at least the constitutional law stuff we talk about in class. The "We, the People" advertisement, well, they knew that one. That one was familiar. And so I got to thinking more about how their misbelief (usually in the form of thinking we each have broader and more constitutional rights than we actually might) works to constitute a more generous (and perhaps more contentious) polity. For example, invoking the rhetoric of equality and privacy and individual freedom all in bald terms helps claims a stake in these concepts for the on-going vitality and deliberativeness of our society. Whether they are claimed correctly or not does not seem to be what matters. Indeed, contested claims -- more circulation and more varied interpretations of constitutional meaning -- may be what keeps us talking. At least such is the case in my constitutional law class.
I think most people misbelieve their Constitutional rights because they belive the Declaration of Independence is the Constitution (or at least part of it).
Posted by: a-train | November 05, 2006 at 05:58 AM
Excellent. I will add this link to our Resource centre website - you've done a great job.
Posted by: san | November 15, 2006 at 11:09 PM
I will add this link to our Resource centre website - you've done a great job.
http://www.cityfly.net
Posted by: lanin | November 15, 2006 at 11:32 PM
this blog is very nice.
Posted by: sanwan | November 15, 2006 at 11:46 PM
Excellent. I will add this link to our Resource centre website - you've done a great job.
Posted by: sanwan | November 15, 2006 at 11:47 PM
Represent Attractive,eye effectively claim neck existence story recent excellent fresh himself properly opinion attend where damage love tour dream vary surround usually difficulty matter analysis quickly plus count separate hardly factor alone move outside above percent slip no decade old woman recently pretty therefore conflict contain thin feeling combine door lose almost just front reading vision divide fair never from like domestic senior specific military bloody while friend right building provided certain remain suitable process answer seem mouth they legislation journey launch representative talk negotiation under argue
Posted by: Regionextra | December 05, 2009 at 06:38 PM
hey friend I like this part of your blog The "We, the People" advertisement, well, they knew that one thanks
Posted by: buy propecia | February 18, 2010 at 06:26 AM
We’re always on the go trying to accomplish so much, aren’s we? Getting groceries, cleaning the house, mowing the lawn - there’s always something. It’s so easy to get caught up in everyday life that we forget how simple it can be to bring cheer to ourselves and others.
Posted by: coach sale | July 07, 2010 at 12:00 AM
Chief Justice Robert's decision for the unanimous Court in in the law school/military recruiting
Posted by: Coach Outlet | July 28, 2010 at 07:50 PM
This will be great for brand advertisers, as they will be able to reap the rewards of all the equity they have built up. Many policies (including the new Google trademark policy) work in favor of affiliates and resellers, while this goes back to Google roots and is benefiting the user experience and connecting them directly with the brand they are looking for.
Posted by: Jordan Hydro | August 20, 2010 at 08:17 PM
The voice shocked so much, really excellent, many thanks to building lord bring so wonderful music for us, thank you.
Posted by: Air Jordan Shoes | November 02, 2010 at 11:01 PM
We know that DfT officials involved in station refurbishment programmes are painfully aware
Posted by: chanel bags | March 21, 2011 at 01:03 AM
It's the first time I seach this site and I am really enthusiastic about so many good articles.
Posted by: Uggs Clearance | June 01, 2011 at 11:57 PM
Your article give me different feelings!
Posted by: Jonathan Toews jersey | June 09, 2011 at 02:15 AM
good,good,good,it's worth.
Posted by: coach purses | June 16, 2011 at 08:49 PM
Thanks.
Posted by: Blake | September 28, 2011 at 09:32 AM
We should be more careful about our constitution . We should maintain what our constitution says.I am scott M. Anderson and my office is Detroit Lawyer
Posted by: Detroit Lawyer | October 10, 2011 at 12:09 AM
If you have been issued with a winding up petition for your company because the company owes money. You can pay the money owed before the court date and get the case droped or fight it if you believe it to be worth defending.
Posted by: Winding Up Petition | November 10, 2011 at 08:19 AM
I just got to this amazing site not long ago. I was actually captured with the piece of resources you have got here.
Posted by: TULSA | November 19, 2011 at 04:30 AM
Surely, I will revisit your site for additional info. Thanks for the article.I really like this website , and hope you will write more ,thanks a lot for your information.
Posted by: moncler jackets | November 20, 2011 at 07:12 PM
Moe Nawaz is recognised as the UK's Most Trusted Insolvency Auditors and mastermind business coach. He has worked in the turnaround industry since 1989. Moe helps over 500 business people every year via a free advice line ukadvice.com. Moe is the founder of mastermind business coaching and a mastermind executive coach himself. His clients include high tech companies, manufacturers, financial services, entrepreneurs and family run businesses throughout Europe. He has been featured on TV, Radio and other Media.
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 24, 2011 at 02:40 PM